“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven” (NASU).
posted 30 September, 2019
reproduced from the Messianic Kosher Helper
“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
Matthew 5:17-19 obviously bears some significant importance for those who not only believe in the continued validity of the Torah in the post-resurrection era, but specifically the continued validity of things like the seventh-day Sabbath/Shabbat or kosher dietary laws. Matthew 5:17-19 has been addressed, in significant detail, in the exegesis paper “Has the Law Been Fulfilled?” in The New Testament Validates Torah by J.K. McKee. Yet, it is important to review a number of key points regarding what Yeshua says about the continuance of the Torah for His followers, and for us to consider what various examiners of Matthew 5:17-19 have said about kosher or the Sabbath.
5:17 In His Sermon on the Mount, Yeshua the Messiah makes the strong assertion, “Do not think that I came to abolish the Torah or the Prophets! I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill” (TLV). The Greek verb plēroō, commonly rendered as “fulfilled,” in the most general sense means “to make full, fill (full)” (BDAG). While this can relate “to bring to completion that which was already begun, complete, finish” (BDAG), likely via the fulfillment of prophecy, plēroō can notably also mean “to perfect, consummate,” in the context of “to make complete in every particular; to render perfect” (Thayer). AMG describes how the verb plēroō can imply “Figuratively, to fill, supply abundantly with something, impart richly, imbue with.”
“Fulfill” is no synonym for “abolish,” and the Messiah’s stated intention was by no means to render Moses’ Teaching inoperative. “Fulfill” can be legitimately understood in terms of the Messiah’s arrival onto the scene of history, accomplishing the different prophetic expectations of the Law, Prophets, and Writings—but there is more. At His immersion by John the Baptist, Yeshua notably told him, “Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill [plēroō] all righteousness” (3:15), which is seemingly all-encompassing—involving components of prophetic accomplishment, Yeshua’s teachings and ministry examples, and the provision of the Holy Spirit to His followers, leading them into all truth (John 14:17). Far from coming to “destroy” (KJV) the relevance of the Torah, Yeshua very much came to show people how to live it properly.
5:18 Further on in Matthew 5:18, Yeshua dismisses any idea that by fulfilling the Torah, its importance and validity will somehow end by His work. He says, “Amen, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or serif shall ever pass away from the Torah until all things come to pass” (TLV). Yeshua the Messiah says the Torah is not going to pass away until Heaven and Earth pass away. Not only does He say that the Torah will not pass away, but that “one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law” (KJV), or “not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished” (RSV). These are references to the minutest strokes of the Hebrew letters of the scroll of the Torah, which can sometimes change the meaning of a word, clause, or sentence—indicating that the finer details of what the Torah says are very important to our Heavenly Father. The Messiah similarly says in Luke 16:17, “it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter of the Law to fail.”
“All” was certainly not “fulfilled” following the ministry, execution, resurrection, and ascension of Yeshua—as much more is still to come in future salvation history. In particular, there are still Messianic expectations in the Law and the Prophets that we are waiting to see manifest, as God’s people urgently desire to see the Messiah return and establish His Millennial Kingdom on Earth.
Contrary to what some may not realize, Heaven and Earth are still with us today. We can walk outside and see the ground and see the sky and even look at the wider cosmos. If Heaven and Earth are still with us today, why do we have those who say that the Torah or the Law of Moses has been totally abolished? Are its principles regarding human conduct and behavior so irrelevant for our modern condition?
5:19 The Messiah issues a great warning to those who teach others to disobey God’s commandments in the Torah, by saying, “Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever keeps and teaches them, this one shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven” (TLV). What we may assume from these words is that one’s status in the Kingdom of God is determined by how one handles or approaches the Torah. If one teaches from the Torah, affording the Torah its due respect and honor, and encourages others to honor and keep its commandments, such a person will be considered great in the Kingdom. If one teaches against the Torah and its commandments, that person will be considered the least.
There is certainly some debate over what Yeshua specifically meant when referring to “these commandments.” There are some theologians who recognize that Yeshua does not speak against the Torah, but believe that “these commandments” He speaks of only relate to those specific commandments mentioned in His Sermon on the Mount in Matthew chs. 5-7—not all, or at least a significant breadth, of the commandments in the Torah.
Certainly, the commandments that Yeshua specifies in His Sermon on the Mount are those that we should not dispute are absolutely imperative to keep. Anyone, especially in a Messianic community that claims to be “Torah observant,” who fails to keep them will most certainly be considered “least.” Nevertheless, Yeshua as a First Century Jewish Rabbi and our example for living upheld the validity of all the commandments of the Torah as key instruction for His followers. J.A. Motyer, reflecting a traditional Reformed perspective of the Law of Moses—which has always held that its moral and ethical instruction remain valid for all places and times for God’s people—does properly direct,
“We need to ask…to what extent the laws of the [Old Testament] continue to apply to believers in the [New Testament]. Matt. 5:17-20 is the key passage, insisting that the Bible is not two testaments but one book, united around the person and the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus said that nothing of the written law would be ‘demolished’ (katalyō), not even the smallest letter (iota) or the least stroke of a pen (keraia); all would come to their full flowering (plēroō), everything would ‘happen’ (ginomai). We are, therefore, not at liberty to dismiss anything as ‘Old Testament’ without asking what is fullness of meaning, significance, and application in Christ is…Our task is not to harmonize two disparate documents (the ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Testaments) but to trace out lines of cumulative revelation which reach their fullness in Christ. As a broad position, even things which the Bible makes temporary as prescriptions for living remain on as principles of godly life, but everything must be judged in the light of the whole Scriptures, i.e. in the light of Christ.”
Matthew 5:17-19 dietary laws application There is little doubting, as is seen in subsequent teaching not only in Yeshua’s Sermon on the Mount (Matthew chs. 5-7), but throughout the Gospels, that our Lord placed an extremely high emphasis on internal heart cleanliness for His followers. There is an emphasis witnessed in the Gospel of Matthew, in particular, on the Torah’s weightier matters—which no one who believes in the continued relevance of kashrut should ignore:
“But go and learn what this means: ‘I DESIRE COMPASSION, AND NOT SACRIFICE’ [Hosea 6:6], for I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners” (Matthew 9:13).
“But if you had known what this means, ‘I DESIRE COMPASSION, AND NOT SACRIFICE’ [Hosea 6:6], you would not have condemned the innocent” (Matthew 12:7).
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others” (Matthew 23:23).
It is to be recognized, that as a definite part of the Messiah’s arrival onto the scene of human history, His sacrifice for sins, and His resurrection from the dead—that there have been some natural changes enacted to the system of the Torah consequent of the Messiah event. These concern the setting aside of animal sacrifices and the Levitical priesthood, until the Tribulation period and Millennium (Hebrews 7:18, 28), or how capital penalties of the Torah may be properly regarded as having been nailed to the cross, and absorbed by Yeshua’s own death (Colossians 2:14). Yeshua was sacrificed for all categories of Torah violation, with permanent forgiveness and atonement available to all people who trust in Him. It is to be noted, though, that no capital penalties are assigned in the Torah to those who eat meats classified as unclean. Even if we might say that Yeshua’s sacrifice covers those who might eat unclean meats or consume blood, no death penalty was prescribed for those in the community of Ancient Israel which did so.
Given His assertion, “Do not suppose that I have come to do away with the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to do away with them but to enforce them” (5:17, Goodspeed New Testament), interpreters have had to weigh what this means. In the estimation of Howard Clark Kee, for example,
“For Matt., at least certain aspects of the ceremonial law are as binding as the moral sections (cf. 5:23; 6:17).”
M. Eugene Boring goes further, in noting a variety of thoughts that contemporary Christian readers (perhaps keeping many of them to themselves?) might have about aspects of Holy Scripture that most of the modern Church does not observe:
“The prefatory declaration of 5:17 is a preemptive strike at what some Christian readers might think when they read 5:21-28, and as they reflect on the fact that their church simply no longer practices some of the clear commands of the Bible: circumcision, the food laws, animal sacrifice, (the Sabbath?). Jesus’ clear ‘I have not come to abolish the Law’ is directed both to those who fear that the new freedom of Christian faith has rejected the Bible and to those who (in their misunderstanding) celebrate that this is the case.”
R.T. France goes further in his commentary on Matthew (2007), mentioning things such as the kosher dietary laws, as presumably being in force for the author of this Gospel. His conclusion is, however, that Matthew’s conclusion sits contrary to other parts of the Apostolic Scriptures, as well as most of what has been witnessed in Christian history and the broad Christian tradition:
“It is these verses more than anything else in the gospel that have fostered the impression that Matthew took a very conservative line on legal observance, believing that the Christian disciple was bound to continue to obey all the commandments of the Torah just as much as, or indeed more meticulously than, those Jews who had not followed Jesus…
“If that is what Matthew intended, the interpreter must face the fact that this teaching is out of step with the overall thrust of NT Christianity and with the almost universal consensus of Christians ever since, at least with regard to the more ceremonial aspects of the OT law, particular its sacrificial provisions…
“[T]he view that Matthew regarded all OT laws (presuming including the sacrificial and food laws) as still binding regulations for the conduct of Jesus’ disciples…runs counter to the rest of the NT and of subsequent Christian thinking…”
Yeshua’s sacrificial work on behalf of humanity has inaugurated the era of the New Covenant, where not only is permanent atonement and forgiveness available—but where God’s commandments are to be supernaturally transcribed onto the hearts and minds of His redeemed people (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:25-27; cf. Hebrews 8:8-12). It is also prophesied that God’s word or Torah will go forth from Zion, with the nations at large seeking to be instructed by it (Micah 4:1-3; Isaiah 2:2-4). Both of these realities would serve to support the continuance of not only the Torah, but also a great deal of its instruction unrelated to the Levitical priesthood and animal sacrifices, for the post-resurrection era.
A great deal of what Yeshua’s fulfillment of the Torah was to involve, is seen in His direction, “For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven” (5:20). Yeshua Himself, in His Sermon on the Mount, specified many areas where His level of expectation for righteous behavior exceeded that of the scribes and Pharisees of Second Temple Judaism, placing a definite emphasis on the internal thoughts and intentions of a person, which if not kept in proper check, would be the place from which physical, sinful activities would originate.
While he has a broad array of issues, ranging from Yeshua’s Sabbath observance to His adherence to ritual purity, in view, S. Westerholm—who is generally negative toward the Torah, and who thinks that the Law of Moses has been abolished for the post-resurrection era—still concludes that Yeshua’s basic adherence to, and presumed criticism of, the Torah’s instruction on outward matters, is little different than that of the Tanach Prophets. Westerholm details,
“While the words at times suggest that the cultic and ritual aspects of religion have no place whatever in a world of ideal piety, the point is rather the condemnation of wrongs than the advocacy of a religion with cult (cf. Amos 5:21-26; Is 1:10-17; Jer 7:21-24; etc.). Still, no more than Jesus does Amos or Hosea, Isaiah or Jeremiah see a contemporary need for new interpretation or expanded observance of ritual requirements. Such matters will care for themselves when justice and mercy find adequate expression.”
Yeshua the Messiah directs, “Do not suppose that, if I have appeared, that was with the intention of abolishing the teaching of the law and the prophets. I have made my appearance not to abolish it, but to give full expression to it” (5:17, God’s New Covenant-Cassirer). A mature man or woman of faith, who looks to the example of Yeshua as one to properly emulate, should be able to properly balance sound inward thoughts and motives with proper outward actions. Wanting to be whole in all aspects of obedience to God, Biblical directions involving adherence to the Sabbath or kosher eating should not be entirely dismissed (at least without first considering or reevaluating passages in the Apostolic Scriptures where they are in view), with only love for God and neighbor (as important as such instructions are) believed to be the only relevant commandments.
While Matthew 5:17-19 is a passage which seldom goes unnoticed by any of today’s Messianic people, it has especially not gone unnoticed by those who have written about the continued validity of the Torah’s dietary code. How have Messianics, writing about the kosher dietary laws, approached Matthew 5:17-19?
Chapter 4 of the book Holy Cow! by Hope Egan, “The New Testament View: Reconciling Apparent Contradictions with the Hebrew Scriptures,” has the following to say about Matthew 5:17-19, in specific association with the Torah’s dietary laws:
“Some say that because Jesus ‘fulfilled’ the Law, we do not have to keep it. But if this were true, why would He encourage His disciples to keep the commands—and teach others to observe them—in the very next verse? Besides, if He fulfilled the law of ‘thou shalt not murder,’ does it mean that we are now free to murder? This may seem like an extreme example, but I think you get my point. Even though Jesus ‘fulfilled’ the Law, I do not feel free to ignore it.
“Instead, since heaven and earth are still around, I think Jesus came to expound on the Law and ‘fill it fully’ with its complete meaning. Rather than giving me a reason for letting go of the Hebrew Scriptures, Jesus made the Torah more interesting and inviting to me—just as He did for the fellows on the road to Emmaus.”
Aaron Eby has more to say in his book Biblically Kosher, examining a few more aspects of whether or not Yeshua nullified the Torah’s dietary instruction. Acknowledging the presence of Matthew 5:17-19, he first states,
“The statement that Yeshua ‘fulfilled the Law’ comes from Matthew 5….From this we can see that ‘fulfilling’ the Torah cannot mean putting it to an end. If Yeshua taught people to relax or neglect the dietary laws of the Torah, he would be called ‘least in the kingdom of heaven’ according to his own words. We cannot say that ‘all is accomplished’ because Yeshua defines this as ‘until heaven and earth pass away.’….[If] Yeshua ‘fulfilled’ the Torah’s kosher laws, it simply means that he kept and upheld them. But if he put them to an end, he would be the ‘least in the kingdom.’”
Eby goes on to reference Deuteronomy 13:1-5, and the warning it contains of a false prophet who would seek to teach against adherence to God’s commandments. He argues that if Yeshua did not keep the Torah’s dietary instructions, or taught against them, that He would not qualify to be the Messiah of Israel:
“We can be confident that Yeshua kept all of the kosher laws of the Bible. If he had not, he would be a sinner, since disobeying the laws of the Torah is sin by definition [1 John 3:4]. If he was a sinner, he certainly could not have been the Messiah. But the Bible assures us that he was sinless (Hebrews 4:15, 7:26; 1 Peter 2:22; 2 Corinthians 5:21)….If Yeshua had taught against the dietary laws in the Torah, he would not qualify as a prophet or the Messiah.”
Eby closes his discussion on Matthew 5 with a reference to Ezekiel 37:24, and the future Messianic Kingdom:
“My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd; and they will walk in My ordinances and keep My statutes and observe them.”
It is important, when entering into discussions about the Apostolic Scriptures and kashrut, to weigh the place of Matthew 5:17-19. Even if a bit contrary to many centuries of Christian thought, these verses should temper us to take a more conservative perspective on the role of the dietary laws for the post-resurrection era. Even if the work of Yeshua the Messiah on the tree at Golgotha (Calvary), may be thought to transcend much of the purity regulation of the Torah, and that the dietary laws do not necessarily have the same degree of importance for Believers in Israel’s Messiah in the post-resurrection era than for Ancient Israel in the pre-resurrection era—Bible readers seeking Scriptural continuity, still owe it to themselves to take a closer look at New Testament passages about eating and food. Do some passages which are commonly thought to abolish the dietary laws, truly do so? Or, might there be some worthwhile, alternative interpretations of some passages—with some different translations of specific terms or clauses, and/or a particular background setting to be considered?
 BDAG, 828.
 Joseph H. Thayer, Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003), pp 517-518.
 Spiros Zodhiates, ed., Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament (Chattanooga: AMG Publishers, 1993), 1177.
 J.A. Motyer, The Message of Exodus (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2005), 245 fn#9.
 Howard Clark Kee, “Matthew,” in Charles M. Laymon, ed., Interpreter’s One-Volume Commentary on the Bible (Nashville: Abingdon, 1971), 615.
 M. Eugene Boring, “The Gospel of Matthew,” in Leander E. Keck, ed. et. al., New Interpreter’s Bible, Vol 8 (Nashville: Abingdon, 1995), 196.
 R.T. France, New International Commentary on the New Testament: The Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), pp 179-180.
 S. Westerholm, “Clean and Unclean,” in Joel B Green, Scot McKnight, and I. Howard Marshall, eds., Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1992), 131.
 Deuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18; cf. Matthew 19:19; 22:39; Mark 12:31; Luke 10:27; Romans 13:9; Galatians 5:14; James 2:8.
 Hope Egan, Holy Cow! Does God Care About What We Eat? (Shelbyville, TN: Heart of Wisdom, 2012), 50.
 Aaron Eby, Biblically Kosher: A Messianic Jewish Perspective on Kashrut (Marshfield, MO: First Fruits of Zion, 2012), pp 23-24.
 “If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder comes true, concerning which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us go after other gods (whom you have not known) and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams; for the LORD your God is testing you to find out if you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. You shall follow the LORD your God and fear Him; and you shall keep His commandments, listen to His voice, serve Him, and cling to Him. But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because he has counseled rebellion against the LORD your God who brought you from the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery, to seduce you from the way in which the LORD your God commanded you to walk. So you shall purge the evil from among you” (Deuteronomy 13:1-5).
 Eby, 25.